articleNew England Journal of MedicineJul 9, 2008BRONZE OA

Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · University of Sheffield · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Noninvasive ventilation (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] or noninvasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation [NIPPV]) appears to be of benefit in the immediate treatment of patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and may reduce mortality. We conducted a study to determine whether noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality and whether there are important differences in outcome associated with the method of treatment (CPAP or NIPPV).

Methods

In a multicenter, open, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned to standard oxygen therapy, CPAP (5 to 15 cm of water), or NIPPV (inspiratory pressure, 8 to 20 cm of water; expiratory pressure, 4 to 10 cm of water). The primary end point for the comparison between noninvasive ventilation and standard oxygen therapy was death within 7 days after the initiation of treatment, and the primary end point for the comparison between NIPPV and CPAP was death or intubation within 7 days.

Citation impact

682
total citations
FWCI
37.68
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Continuous positive airway pressure
  • Noninvasive ventilation
  • Positive pressure ventilation
  • Ventilation (architecture)
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Anesthesia
  • Mechanical ventilation
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.