German Acupuncture Trials (Gerac) For Chronic Low Back Pain<subtitle>Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial With 3 Groups</subtitle>
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · Ruhr University Bochum · +2 more institutions
Abstract
To our knowledge, verum acupuncture has never been directly compared with sham acupuncture and guideline-based conventional therapy in patients with chronic low back pain.
A patient- and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted in Germany involving 340 outpatient practices, including 1162 patients aged 18 to 86 years (mean +/- SD age, 50 +/- 15 years) with a history of chronic low back pain for a mean of 8 years. Patients underwent ten 30-minute sessions, generally 2 sessions per week, of verum acupuncture (n = 387) according to principles of traditional Chinese medicine; sham acupuncture (n = 387) consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points; or conventional therapy, a combination of drugs, physical therapy, and exercise (n = 388). Five additional sessions were offered to patients who had a partial response to treatment (10%-50% reduction in pain intensity). Primary outcome was response after 6 months, defined as 33% improvement or better on 3 pain-related items on the Von Korff Chronic Pain Grade Scale questionnaire or 12% improvement or better on the back-specific Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Patients who were unblinded or had recourse to other than permitted concomitant therapies during follow-up were classified as nonresponders regardless of symptom improvement.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 130.09
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 30
Authors
1Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Acupuncture
- Dry needling
- Confidence interval
- Physical therapy
- Randomized controlled trial
- Low back pain
- Internal medicine
- Good health and well-being