articleJAMAJun 8, 2004Closed access

A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary Syndrome

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · Michigan Medicine

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To develop a simple decision tool for bedside risk estimation of 6-month mortality in patients surviving admission for an ACS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A multinational registry, involving 94 hospitals in 14 countries, that used data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) to develop and validate a multivariable stepwise regression model for death during 6 months postdischarge. From 17,142 patients presenting with an ACS from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, and discharged alive, 15,007 (87.5%) had complete 6-month follow-up and represented the development cohort for a model that was subsequently tested on a validation cohort of 7638 patients admitted from April 1, 2002, to December 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality during 6 months postdischarge after admission for an ACS.

Results

The 6-month mortality rates were similar in the development (n = 717; 4.8%) and validation cohorts (n = 331; 4.7%). The risk-prediction tool for all forms of ACS identified 9 variables predictive of 6-month mortality: older age, history of myocardial infarction, history of heart failure, increased pulse rate at presentation, lower systolic blood pressure at presentation, elevated initial serum creatinine level, elevated initial serum cardiac biomarker levels, ST-segment depression on presenting electrocardiogram, and not having a percutaneous coronary intervention performed in hospital. The c statistics for the development and validation cohorts were 0.81 and 0.75, respectively.

Citation impact

1,585
total citations
FWCI
29.79
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

15

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Cohort
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Internal medicine
  • Creatinine
  • Mortality rate
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding