articleNew England Journal of MedicineOct 29, 2003BRONZE OA

Subcutaneous Fondaparinux versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism

TMThe Matisse Investigators

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The standard initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism is intravenous unfractionated heparin, requiring laboratory monitoring and hospitalization.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, open-label trial involving 2213 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of the synthetic antithrombotic agent fondaparinux with those of unfractionated heparin and to document noninferiority in terms of efficacy. Patients received either fondaparinux (5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg in patients weighing less than 50, 50 to 100, or more than 100 kg, respectively) subcutaneously once daily or a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (ratio of the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a control value, 1.5 to 2.5), both given for at least five days and until the use of vitamin K antagonists resulted in an international normalized ratio above 2.0. The primary efficacy outcome was the three-month incidence of the composite end point of symptomatic, recurrent pulmonary embolism (nonfatal or fatal) and new or recurrent deep-vein thrombosis.

Citation impact

888
total citations
FWCI
41.57
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

1
  • TM
    The Matisse InvestigatorsCorresponding

    Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Fondaparinux
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Heparin
  • Partial thromboplastin time
  • Deep vein
  • Anesthesia
  • Surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.