articleJournal of Clinical OncologyJul 15, 2002Closed access

Phase III Study of Concurrent Versus Sequential Thoracic Radiotherapy in Combination With Cisplatin and Etoposide for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9104

National Cancer Center Hospital East

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Results

Concurrent radiotherapy yielded better survival than sequential radiotherapy (P =.097 by log-rank test). The median survival time was 19.7 months in the sequential arm versus 27.2 months in the concurrent arm. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for patients who received sequential radiotherapy were 35.1%, 20.2%, and 18.3%, respectively, as opposed to 54.4%, 29.8% and 23.7%, respectively, for the patients who received concurrent radiotherapy. Hematologic toxicity was more severe in the concurrent arm. However, severe esophagitis was infrequent in both arms, occurring in 9% of the patients in the concurrent arm and 4% in the sequential arm.

Conclusion

This study strongly suggests that cisplatin plus etoposide and concurrent radiotherapy is more effective for the treatment of LS-SCLC than cisplatin plus etoposide and sequential radiotherapy.

Citation impact

702
total citations
FWCI
14.16
Percentile
100%
References
25
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Etoposide
  • Radiation therapy
  • Cisplatin
  • Lung cancer
  • Chemotherapy
  • Internal medicine
  • Oncology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.