articleJul 10, 2006Closed access

A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms

University of Washington · Stanford University · +2 more institutions

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative comparison of several multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Until now, the lack of suitable calibrated multi-view image datasets with known ground truth (3D shape models) has prevented such direct comparisons. In this paper, we first survey multi-view stereo algorithms and compare them qualitatively using a taxonomy that differentiates their key properties. We then describe our process for acquiring and calibrating multiview image datasets with high-accuracy ground truth and introduce our evaluation methodology. Finally, we present the results of our quantitative comparison of state-of-the-art multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms on six benchmark datasets. The…

Citation impact

2,389
total citations
FWCI
78.54
Percentile
100%
References
78
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Ground truth
  • Computer science
  • Benchmark (surveying)
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Process (computing)
  • Key (lock)
  • Algorithm
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Sustainable cities and communities
No related works found for this paper.