A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms
University of Washington · Stanford University · +2 more institutions
Abstract
This paper presents a quantitative comparison of several multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Until now, the lack of suitable calibrated multi-view image datasets with known ground truth (3D shape models) has prevented such direct comparisons. In this paper, we first survey multi-view stereo algorithms and compare them qualitatively using a taxonomy that differentiates their key properties. We then describe our process for acquiring and calibrating multiview image datasets with high-accuracy ground truth and introduce our evaluation methodology. Finally, we present the results of our quantitative comparison of state-of-the-art multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms on six benchmark datasets. The…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 78.54
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 78
Authors
5Topics & keywords
- Ground truth
- Computer science
- Benchmark (surveying)
- Artificial intelligence
- Computer vision
- Process (computing)
- Key (lock)
- Algorithm
- Sustainable cities and communities