Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease
Duke University · Clinical Research Institute · +9 more institutions
Abstract
Many patients have symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and are often evaluated with the use of diagnostic testing, although there are limited data from randomized trials to guide care.
We randomly assigned 10,003 symptomatic patients to a strategy of initial anatomical testing with the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or to functional testing (exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress testing, or stress echocardiography). The composite primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or major procedural complication. Secondary end points included invasive cardiac catheterization that did not show obstructive CAD and radiation exposure.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 143.16
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 91
Authors
20- PSPamela S. DouglasCorresponding
Duke University, Clinical Research Institute
- UHUdo Hoffmann
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University
- MRManesh R. Patel
Clinical Research Institute, Duke University
- DBDaniel B. Mark
Clinical Research Institute, Duke University
- HRHussein R. Al‐Khalidi
Duke University, Clinical Research Institute
Topics & keywords
- Coronary artery disease
- Medicine
- Disease
- Cardiology
- Randomized controlled trial
- Internal medicine
- CAD
- Diagnostic test
- Good health and well-being
Funding
- BSBristol-Myers Squibb
- ELEli Lilly and Company
- AAstraZeneca
- GSGilead Sciences
- APAlnylam Pharmaceuticals
- IIkaria
- OPOtsuka Pharmaceutical
- BIBiosensors International Group
- SJSt. Jude Medical
- AVAbbott Vascular
- NHNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteAwards: R01HL098237, R01HL098235, R01HL098236, R01HL098305
- JPJanssen Pharmaceuticals