articleJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteNov 17, 2009Closed access

Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

In cancer treatment trials, the standard source of adverse symptom data is clinician reporting by use of items from the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Patient self-reporting has been proposed as an additional data source, but the implications of such a shift are not understood.

Methods

Patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy and their clinicians independently reported six CTCAE symptoms and Karnofsky Performance Status longitudinally at sequential office visits. To compare how patient's vs clinician's reports relate to sentinel clinical events, a time-dependent Cox regression model was used to measure associations between reaching particular CTCAE grade severity thresholds with the risk of death and emergency room visits. To measure concordance of CTCAE reports with indices of daily health status, Kendall tau rank correlation coefficients were calculated for each symptom with EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire and global question scores. Statistical tests were two-sided.

Citation impact

625
total citations
FWCI
7.74
Percentile
100%
References
40
Citations per year

Authors

13

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Adverse effect
  • Event (particle physics)
  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding