Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism
THThe Hokusai-VTE Investigators
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Background
Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear.
Methods
In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.
Citation impact
1,859
total citations
- FWCI
- 145.58
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 25
Citations per year
Authors
1- THThe Hokusai-VTE InvestigatorsCorresponding
Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Edoxaban
- Warfarin
- Venous thromboembolism
- Medicine
- Internal medicine
- Intensive care medicine
- Atrial fibrillation
- Rivaroxaban
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.