articleNew England Journal of MedicineSep 1, 2013GREEN OA

Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism

THThe Hokusai-VTE Investigators
PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Whether the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban can be an alternative to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism is unclear.

Methods

In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, we randomly assigned patients with acute venous thromboembolism, who had initially received heparin, to receive edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily, or 30 mg once daily (e.g., in the case of patients with creatinine clearance of 30 to 50 ml per minute or a body weight below 60 kg), or to receive warfarin. Patients received the study drug for 3 to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.

Citation impact

1,859
total citations
FWCI
145.58
Percentile
100%
References
25
Citations per year

Authors

1
  • TH
    The Hokusai-VTE InvestigatorsCorresponding

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Edoxaban
  • Warfarin
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Intensive care medicine
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Rivaroxaban
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding