articleSep 26, 2010Closed access
Beyond accuracy
Indexed incrossref
Abstract
When we evaluate the quality of recommender systems (RS), most approaches only focus on the predictive accuracy of these systems. Recent works suggest that beyond accuracy there is a variety of other metrics that should be considered when evaluating a RS. In this paper we focus on two crucial metrics in RS evaluation: coverage and serendipity. Based on a literature review, we first discuss both measurement methods as well as the trade-off between good coverage and serendipity. We then analyze the role of coverage and serendipity as indicators of recommendation quality, present novel ways of how they can be measured and discuss how to interpret the obtained measurements. Overall, we argue that our new ways of…
Citation impact
639
total citations
- FWCI
- 42.10
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 12
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Serendipity
- Computer science
- Focus (optics)
- Quality (philosophy)
- Recommender system
- Variety (cybernetics)
- Impression
- Data science
No related works found for this paper.