articleBMC Health Services ResearchDec 22, 2004GOLD OA

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · Newcastle University · +10 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

A number of approaches have been used to grade levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations. The use of many different approaches detracts from one of the main reasons for having explicit approaches: to concisely characterise and communicate this information so that it can easily be understood and thereby help people make well-informed decisions. Our objective was to critically appraise six prominent systems for grading levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations as a basis for agreeing on characteristics of a common, sensible approach to grading levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Methods

Six prominent systems for grading levels of evidence and strength of recommendations were selected and someone familiar with each system prepared a description of each of these. Twelve assessors independently evaluated each system based on twelve criteria to assess the sensibility of the different approaches. Systems used by 51 organisations were compared with these six approaches.

Citation impact

1,226
total citations
FWCI
18.42
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

15

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Grading (engineering)
  • Critical appraisal
  • Medicine
  • Harm
  • Health informatics
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Psychology
  • Nursing
No related works found for this paper.