The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · University College London · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

This article considers the scientific process whereby new and better clinical tests of executive function might be developed, and what form they might take. We argue that many of the traditional tests of executive function most commonly in use (e.g., the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; Stroop) are adaptations of procedures that emerged almost coincidentally from conceptual and experimental frameworks far removed from those currently in favour, and that the prolongation of their use has been encouraged by a sustained period of concentration on "construct-driven" experimentation in neuropsychology. This resulted from the special theoretical demands made by the field of executive function, but was not a necessary…

Citation impact

659
total citations
FWCI
9.79
Percentile
100%
References
173
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Neuropsychology
  • Psychology
  • Situational ethics
  • Function (biology)
  • Construct (python library)
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Representativeness heuristic
No related works found for this paper.

Funding