articleMilbank QuarterlyMar 1, 2009Closed access

The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food?

University of Michigan · Yale University · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

A review and analysis of empirical and historical evidence pertaining to tobacco and food industry practices, messages, and strategies to influence public opinion, legislation and regulation, litigation, and the conduct of science.

Findings

The tobacco industry had a playbook, a script, that emphasized personal responsibility, paying scientists who delivered research that instilled doubt, criticizing the "junk" science that found harms associated with smoking, making self-regulatory pledges, lobbying with massive resources to stifle government action, introducing "safer" products, and simultaneously manipulating and denying both the addictive nature of their products and their marketing to children. The script of the food industry is both similar to and different from the tobacco industry script.

Citation impact

680
total citations
FWCI
19.81
Percentile
100%
References
76
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Tobacco industry
  • Government (linguistics)
  • Harm
  • Legislation
  • Newspaper
  • Business
  • Action (physics)
  • Food industry
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.