articleAmerican Journal of EpidemiologyOct 29, 2003BRONZE OA

Evaluating Medication Effects Outside of Clinical Trials: New-User Designs

Vanderbilt University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Recent clinical trials demonstrating that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) does not prevent coronary heart disease in women have again raised doubts concerning observational studies. Although much of the explanation probably lies in what might be called the "healthy HRT user" effect, another contributing factor may be that most observational studies included many prevalent users: women taking HRT for some time before study follow-up began. This practice can cause two types of bias, both of which plausibly may have contributed to the discrepancy between observational and randomized studies. First, prevalent users are "survivors" of the early period of pharmacotherapy, which can introduce substantial bias if…

Citation impact

1,613
total citations
FWCI
54.68
Percentile
100%
References
58
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Observational study
  • Confounding
  • Medicine
  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Intensive care medicine
  • Clinical trial
  • Hormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding