articleJAMAFeb 19, 2013Closed access

Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic Disease

Columbia University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

Although robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions has been reported, little is known about the incorporation of the procedure into practice, its complication profile, or its costs compared with other routes of hysterectomy.

Objectives

To analyze the uptake of robotically assisted hysterectomy, to determine the association between use of robotic surgery and rates of abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy, and to compare the in-house complications of robotically assisted hysterectomy vs abdominal and laparoscopic procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cohort study of 264,758 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disorders at 441 hospitals across the United States from 2007 to 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uptake of and factors associated with utilization of robotically assisted hysterectomy. Complications, transfusion, reoperation, length of stay, death, and cost for women who underwent robotic hysterectomy compared with both abdominal and laparoscopic procedures were analyzed.

Citation impact

575
total citations
FWCI
62.35
Percentile
100%
References
36
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Abdominal hysterectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Complication
  • Surgery
  • Retrospective cohort study
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.