Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · New York Hospital Queens · +14 more institutions
Abstract
The use of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement has been shown to reduce mortality among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgical replacement. However, the two procedures have not been compared in a randomized trial involving high-risk patients who are still candidates for surgical replacement.
At 25 centers, we randomly assigned 699 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis to undergo either transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable bovine pericardial valve (either a transfemoral or a transapical approach) or surgical replacement. The primary end point was death from any cause at 1 year. The primary hypothesis was that transcatheter replacement is not inferior to surgical replacement.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 291.18
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 44
Authors
23- CRCraig R. SmithCorresponding
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Hospital Queens, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
- MBMartin B. Leon
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York Hospital Queens, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
- MJMichael J. Mack
Baylor Scott & White Health
- DCD. Craig Miller
Palo Alto University, Stanford University
- JWJeffrey W. Moses
New York Hospital Queens, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Valve replacement
- Stenosis
- Aortic valve replacement
- Surgery
- Confidence interval
- Aortic valve stenosis
- Clinical endpoint
- Good health and well-being