articleJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteNov 25, 2008BRONZE OA

Systematic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy vs No Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Randomized Clinical Trial

Sapienza University of Rome · Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti · +17 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Pelvic lymph nodes are the most common site of extrauterine tumor spread in early-stage endometrial cancer, but the clinical impact of lymphadenectomy has not been addressed in randomized studies. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the addition of pelvic systematic lymphadenectomy to standard hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy improves overall and disease-free survival.

Methods

From October 1, 1996, through March 31, 2006, 514 eligible patients with preoperative International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I endometrial carcinoma were randomly assigned to undergo pelvic systematic lymphadenectomy (n = 264) or no lymphadenectomy (n = 250). Patients' clinical data, pathological tumor characteristics, and operative and early postoperative data were recorded at discharge from hospital. Late postoperative complications, adjuvant therapy, and follow-up data were collected 6 months after surgery. Survival was analyzed by use of the log-rank test and a Cox multivariable regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Citation impact

1,547
total citations
FWCI
51.85
Percentile
100%
References
32
Citations per year

Authors

26

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Lymphadenectomy
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Interquartile range
  • Lymph node
  • Carcinoma
  • Stage (stratigraphy)
  • Surgery
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.