Early Surgery versus Conventional Treatment for Infective Endocarditis
Asan Medical Center · University of Ulsan · +3 more institutions
Abstract
The timing and indications for surgical intervention to prevent systemic embolism in infective endocarditis remain controversial. We conducted a trial to compare clinical outcomes of early surgery and conventional treatment in patients with infective endocarditis.
We randomly assigned patients with left-sided infective endocarditis, severe valve disease, and large vegetations to early surgery (37 patients) or conventional treatment (39). The primary end point was a composite of in-hospital death and embolic events that occurred within 6 weeks after randomization.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 43.46
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 22
Authors
12- DKDuk‐Hyun KangCorresponding
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- YJYong Jin Kim
New Generation University College, Seoul National University Hospital, National University College
- SKSung‐Han Kim
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- BJByung Joo Sun
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan
- DKDae‐Hee Kim
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Infective endocarditis
- Hazard ratio
- Surgery
- Randomization
- Endocarditis
- Confidence interval
- Clinical endpoint
- Good health and well-being