articleNew England Journal of MedicineJun 27, 2012BRONZE OA

Early Surgery versus Conventional Treatment for Infective Endocarditis

Asan Medical Center · University of Ulsan · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The timing and indications for surgical intervention to prevent systemic embolism in infective endocarditis remain controversial. We conducted a trial to compare clinical outcomes of early surgery and conventional treatment in patients with infective endocarditis.

Methods

We randomly assigned patients with left-sided infective endocarditis, severe valve disease, and large vegetations to early surgery (37 patients) or conventional treatment (39). The primary end point was a composite of in-hospital death and embolic events that occurred within 6 weeks after randomization.

Citation impact

897
total citations
FWCI
43.46
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Hazard ratio
  • Surgery
  • Randomization
  • Endocarditis
  • Confidence interval
  • Clinical endpoint
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.