Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement
University of Toronto · Karolinska Institutet · +10 more institutions
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The CONSORT statement is intended to improve reporting of randomised controlled trials and focuses on minimising the risk of bias (internal validity). The applicability of a trial's results (generalisability or external validity) is also important, particularly for pragmatic trials. A pragmatic trial (a term first used in 1967 by Schwartz and Lellouch) can be broadly defined as a randomised controlled trial whose purpose is to inform decisions about practice. This extension of the CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of such trials and focuses on applicability. Methods At two, two-day meetings held in Toronto in 2005 and 2008, we reviewed the CONSORT statement and its extensions,…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 77.13
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 89
Authors
9- MZMerrick ZwarensteinCorresponding
University of Toronto, Karolinska Institutet, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Hospital
- STShaun Treweek
University of Dundee, Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten
- JGJoel Gagnier
University of Toronto, Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten
- DADoug Altman
University of Oxford
- STSean Tunis
Johns Hopkins University, Center for Medical Technology Policy, Stanford University
Topics & keywords
- Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
- Checklist
- Blinding
- External validity
- Clinical trial
- Psychological intervention
- Medicine
- Systematic review
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions