The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence

University of Adelaide

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Recently there has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Key features of a systematic review include the creation of an a priori protocol, clear inclusion criteria, a structured and systematic search process, critical appraisal of studies, and a formal process of data extraction followed by methods to synthesize, or combine, this data. Currently there exists no standard method for conducting critical appraisal of studies in systematic reviews of prevalence data.

Methods

A working group was created to assess current critical appraisal tools for studies reporting prevalence data and develop a new tool for these studies in systematic reviews of prevalence. Following the development of this tool it was piloted amongst an experienced group of sixteen healthcare researchers.

Citation impact

1,429
total citations
FWCI
26.31
Percentile
100%
References
24
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Critical appraisal
  • Systematic review
  • Data extraction
  • Protocol (science)
  • Process (computing)
  • Management science
  • Inclusion (mineral)
  • Systematic process
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.