reviewBMJApr 21, 2005BRONZE OA

Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding

MMMuhammad MamdaniKSKathy SykoraPLPing LiSTSharon‐Lise T. NormandDLDavid L. Streiner

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · Harvard University · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Although confounding is an important problem of cohort studies, its effects can be minimised to enable valid comparison

Citation impact

640
total citations
FWCI
43.80
Percentile
100%
References
18
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Topics
Keywords
  • Confounding
  • Critical appraisal
  • Computer science
  • Data science
  • Cohort
  • Cohort study
  • Medicine
  • Alternative medicine
No related works found for this paper.