reviewJournal of Clinical OncologyJul 29, 2014GREEN OA

International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer

KU Leuven

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after literature review of key evidence on the following topics: rationale for performing GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict oncology treatment–related complications; association between GA findings and overall survival (OS); impact of GA findings on oncology treatment decisions; composition of a GA, including domains and tools; and methods for implementing GA in clinical care.

Results

GA can be valuable in oncology practice for following reasons: detection of impairment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatment-related toxicity, ability to predict OS in a variety of tumors and treatment settings, and ability to influence treatment choice and intensity. The panel recommended that the following domains be evaluated in a GA: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, mental health status, fatigue, social status and support, nutrition, and presence of geriatric syndromes. Although several combinations of tools and various models are available for implementation of GA in oncology practice, the expert panel could not endorse one over another.

Citation impact

1,782
total citations
FWCI
57.25
Percentile
100%
References
73
Citations per year

Authors

19

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Geriatric oncology
  • Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Internal medicine
  • Comorbidity
  • Personalized medicine
  • Geriatrics
  • Cancer
No related works found for this paper.

Funding