reviewEvaluation & the Health ProfessionsMar 1, 2006Closed access

Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research

University of California, San Francisco · Kaiser Permanente

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Starting with the proposition that "if we want more evidence-based practice, we need more practice-based evidence," this article (a) offers questions and guides that practitioners, program planners, and policy makers can use to determine the applicability of evidence to situations and populations other than those in which the evidence was produced (generalizability), (b) suggests criteria that reviewers can use to evaluate external validity and potential for generalization, and (c) recommends procedures that practitioners and program planners can use to adapt evidence-based interventions and integrate them with evidence on the population and setting characteristics, theory, and experience into locally…

Citation impact

916
total citations
FWCI
99.75
Percentile
100%
References
102
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Generalizability theory
  • Relevance (law)
  • Generalization
  • Proposition
  • External validity
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Psychological intervention
  • Psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.