articleAmerican Political Science ReviewAug 1, 2005Closed access

Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina

Yale University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Political machines (or clientelist parties) mobilize electoral support by trading particularistic benefits to voters in exchange for their votes. But if the secret ballot hides voters' actions from the machine, voters are able to renege, accepting benefits and then voting as they choose. To explain how machine politics works, I observe that machines use their deep insertion into voters' social networks to try to circumvent the secret ballot and infer individuals' votes. When parties influence how people vote by threatening to punish them for voting for another party, I call this accountability . I analyze the strategic interaction between machines and voters as an iterated prisoners' dilemma game with…

Citation impact

1,592
total citations
FWCI
59.01
Percentile
100%
References
27
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Ballot
  • Accountability
  • Voting
  • Dilemma
  • Prisoner's dilemma
  • Politics
  • Political machine
  • Ideology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • No poverty
No related works found for this paper.