Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda
University of Rochester · Harvard University
Abstract
Mainstream comparative research on political institutions focuses primarily on formal rules. Yet in many contexts, informal institutions, ranging from bureaucratic and legislative norms to clientelism and patrimonialism, shape even more strongly political behavior and outcomes. Scholars who fail to consider these informal rules of the game risk missing many of the most important incentives and constraints that underlie political behavior. In this article we develop a framework for studying informal institutions and integrating them into comparative institutional analysis. The framework is based on a typology of four patterns of formal-informal institutional interaction: complementary, accommodating, competing,…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 116.31
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 104
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Typology
- Political science
- Knight
- Politics
- Mainstream
- Bureaucracy
- Comparative politics
- Incentive