The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Is moral judgment accomplished by intuition or conscious reasoning? An answer demands a detailed account of the moral principles in question. We investigated three principles that guide moral judgments: (a) Harm caused by action is worse than harm caused by omission, (b) harm intended as the means to a goal is worse than harm foreseen as the side effect of a goal, and (c) harm involving physical contact with the victim is worse than harm involving no physical contact. Asking whether these principles are invoked to explain moral judgments, we found that subjects generally appealed to the first and third principles in their justifications, but not to the second. This finding has significance for methods and…
Citation impact
1,004
total citations
- FWCI
- 14.75
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 28
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Harm
- Intuition
- Psychology
- Moral reasoning
- Moral disengagement
- Moral psychology
- Action (physics)
- Social psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.