reviewJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryNov 21, 2013Closed access

Long-term prognosis after intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis

University of Edinburgh · Academic Medical Center · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Methods

We searched Ovid Medline 1946-2011 inclusive for cohort studies of ≥50 patients reporting long-term (>30 days) outcome after ICH. Two reviewers independently extracted data from each study. We meta-analysed 1-year and 5-year survival data from population-based studies using a random effects model (and quantified inconsistency using the I2 statistic).

Results

We identified 122 eligible studies. The pooled estimate of 1-year survival was 46% (95% CI 43% to 49%; nine population-based studies (n=2408); I2=27%) and 5-year survival was 29% (95% CI 26% to 33%; three population-based studies (n=699); I2=6%). In 27 cohort studies, predictors most consistently associated with death were increasing age, decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale score, increasing ICH volume, presence of intraventricular haemorrhage, and deep/infratentorial ICH location. The annual risk of recurrent ICH varied from 1.3% to 7.4% in nine studies and this risk was higher after lobar ICH than non-lobar ICH in two of three hospital-based studies. Four studies reporting the risks of recurrent ICH and ischaemic stroke after ICH found no significant differences between these risks.

Citation impact

631
total citations
FWCI
16.32
Percentile
100%
References
70
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Glasgow Coma Scale
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Meta-analysis
  • Population
  • Stroke (engine)
  • Cohort study
  • Cohort
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding