Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
The ability to self-correct is considered a hallmark of science. However, self-correction does not always happen to scientific evidence by default. The trajectory of scientific credibility can fluctuate over time, both for defined scientific fields and for science at-large. History suggests that major catastrophes in scientific credibility are unfortunately possible and the argument that "it is obvious that progress is made" is weak. Careful evaluation of the current status of credibility of various scientific fields is important in order to understand any credibility deficits and how one could obtain and establish more trustworthy results. Efficient and unbiased replication mechanisms are essential for…
Citation impact
590
total citations
- FWCI
- 34.02
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 61
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Credibility
- Fallacy
- Argument (complex analysis)
- Replication (statistics)
- Trustworthiness
- Psychological science
- Scientific evidence
- Psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.