articlePerspectives on Psychological ScienceNov 1, 2012Closed access

Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting

Stanford University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

The ability to self-correct is considered a hallmark of science. However, self-correction does not always happen to scientific evidence by default. The trajectory of scientific credibility can fluctuate over time, both for defined scientific fields and for science at-large. History suggests that major catastrophes in scientific credibility are unfortunately possible and the argument that "it is obvious that progress is made" is weak. Careful evaluation of the current status of credibility of various scientific fields is important in order to understand any credibility deficits and how one could obtain and establish more trustworthy results. Efficient and unbiased replication mechanisms are essential for…

Citation impact

590
total citations
FWCI
34.02
Percentile
100%
References
61
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Credibility
  • Fallacy
  • Argument (complex analysis)
  • Replication (statistics)
  • Trustworthiness
  • Psychological science
  • Scientific evidence
  • Psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.