articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyJan 31, 2011Closed access

Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).

University of Amsterdam

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Does psi exist? D. J. Bem (2011) conducted 9 studies with over 1,000 participants in an attempt to demonstrate that future events retroactively affect people's responses. Here we discuss several limitations of Bem's experiments on psi; in particular, we show that the data analysis was partly exploratory and that one-sided p values may overstate the statistical evidence against the null hypothesis. We reanalyze Bem's data with a default Bayesian t test and show that the evidence for psi is weak to nonexistent. We argue that in order to convince a skeptical audience of a controversial claim, one needs to conduct strictly confirmatory studies and analyze the results with statistical tests that are conservative…

Citation impact

1,013
total citations
FWCI
23.37
Percentile
100%
References
39
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Psychology
  • Skepticism
  • Null hypothesis
  • Statistical hypothesis testing
  • Test (biology)
  • Affect (linguistics)
  • Bayesian probability
  • Social psychology
No related works found for this paper.