reviewJournal of Applied PsychologyJan 1, 2008Closed access

Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence.

California State University, Long Beach · Michigan State University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

A meta-analysis of stereotype threat effects was conducted and an overall mean effect size of |.26| was found, but true moderator effects existed. A series of hierarchical moderator analyses evidenced differential effects of race- versus gender-based stereotypes. Women experienced smaller performance decrements than did minorities when tests were difficult: mean ds = |.36| and |.43|, respectively. For women, subtle threat-activating cues produced the largest effect, followed by blatant and moderately explicit cues: ds = |.24|, |.18|, and |.17|, respectively; explicit threat-removal strategies were more effective in reducing stereotype threat effects than subtle ones: ds = |.14| and |.33|, respectively. For…

Citation impact

825
total citations
FWCI
57.04
Percentile
100%
References
124
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Stereotype threat
  • Moderation
  • Psychology
  • Stereotype (UML)
  • Affect (linguistics)
  • Social psychology
  • Differential effects
  • Meta-analysis
No related works found for this paper.

Funding