Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence.
California State University, Long Beach · Michigan State University
Abstract
A meta-analysis of stereotype threat effects was conducted and an overall mean effect size of |.26| was found, but true moderator effects existed. A series of hierarchical moderator analyses evidenced differential effects of race- versus gender-based stereotypes. Women experienced smaller performance decrements than did minorities when tests were difficult: mean ds = |.36| and |.43|, respectively. For women, subtle threat-activating cues produced the largest effect, followed by blatant and moderately explicit cues: ds = |.24|, |.18|, and |.17|, respectively; explicit threat-removal strategies were more effective in reducing stereotype threat effects than subtle ones: ds = |.14| and |.33|, respectively. For…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 57.04
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 124
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Stereotype threat
- Moderation
- Psychology
- Stereotype (UML)
- Affect (linguistics)
- Social psychology
- Differential effects
- Meta-analysis