articleSystematic ReviewsJul 24, 2014GOLD OA

A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation

University of York · University of Bristol · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

The grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach is widely implemented in health technology assessment and guideline development organisations throughout the world. GRADE provides a transparent approach to reaching judgements about the quality of evidence on the effects of a health care intervention, but is complex and therefore challenging to apply in a consistent manner.

Methods

We developed a checklist to guide the researcher to extract the data required to make a GRADE assessment. We applied the checklist to 29 meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of health care interventions. Two reviewers used the checklist for each paper and used these data to rate the quality of evidence for a particular outcome.

Citation impact

599
total citations
FWCI
121.24
Percentile
100%
References
52
Citations per year

Authors

10

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Checklist
  • Grading (engineering)
  • Medicine
  • Psychological intervention
  • Guideline
  • Consistency (knowledge bases)
  • Health care
  • Quality (philosophy)
No related works found for this paper.

Funding