articleJournal of Clinical OncologyDec 30, 2004Closed access

Randomized Phase III Trial of High-Dose Interleukin-2 Versus Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 and Interferon in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

City Of Hope National Medical Center · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Results

One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled between April 1997 and July 2000. Toxicities were as anticipated for these regimens. The response rate was 23.2% (22 of 95 patients) for HD IL-2 versus 9.9% (nine of 91 patients) for IL-2/IFN (P = .018). Ten patients receiving HD IL-2 were progression-free at 3 years versus three patients receiving IL-2 and IFN (P = .082). The median response durations were 24 and 15 [corrected] months (P = .18) [corrected] and median survivals were 17.5 and 13 months (P = .24). For patients with bone or liver metastases (P = .001) or a primary tumor in place (P = .040), survival was superior with HD IL-2.

Conclusion

This randomized phase III trial provides additional evidence that HD IL-2 should remain the preferred therapy for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Citation impact

819
total citations
FWCI
37.43
Percentile
100%
References
23
Citations per year

Authors

18

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • Gastroenterology
  • Internal medicine
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Carcinoma
  • Surgery
  • Urology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.