articleManagement ScienceDec 1, 2006Closed access

Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research

Georgia Institute of Technology · University of Wisconsin–Madison

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Despite recurring concerns about common method variance (CMV) in survey research, the information systems (IS) community remains largely uncertain of the extent of such potential biases. To address this uncertainty, this paper attempts to systematically examine the impact of CMV on the inferences drawn from survey research in the IS area. First, we describe the available approaches for assessing CMV and conduct an empirical study to compare them. From an actual survey involving 227 respondents, we find that although CMV is present in the research areas examined, such biases are not substantial. The results also suggest that few differences exist between the relatively new marker-variable technique and other…

Citation impact

3,167
total citations
FWCI
71.67
Percentile
100%
References
73
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Variable (mathematics)
  • Econometrics
  • Variance (accounting)
  • Common-method variance
  • Statistics
  • Psychology
  • Mathematics
  • Economics
No related works found for this paper.

Funding