reviewJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteFeb 1, 2005BRONZE OA

Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Tufts University · University of Ioannina · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Interest in the use of preoperative systemic treatment in the management of breast cancer has increased because such neoadjuvant therapy appears to reduce the extent of local surgery required. We compared the clinical end points of patients with breast cancer treated preoperatively with systemic therapy (neoadjuvant therapy) and of those treated postoperatively with the same regimen (adjuvant therapy) in a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Methods

We evaluated nine randomized studies, including a total of 3946 patients with breast cancer, that compared neoadjuvant therapy with adjuvant therapy regardless of what additional surgery and/or radiation treatment was used. Fixed and random effects methods were used to combine data. Primary outcomes were death, disease progression, distant disease recurrence, and loco-regional disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were local response and conservative local treatment. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Citation impact

1,207
total citations
FWCI
12.95
Percentile
100%
References
40
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Breast cancer
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Radiation therapy
  • Adjuvant therapy
  • Relative risk
  • Regimen
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.