articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyJan 1, 2011Closed access

The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach.

University of Minnesota · University of California, Santa Barbara

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Why do some people take risks and live for the present, whereas others avoid risks and save for the future? The evolutionary framework of life history theory predicts that preferences for risk and delay in gratification should be influenced by mortality and resource scarcity. A series of experiments examined how mortality cues influenced decisions involving risk preference (e.g., $10 for sure vs. 50% chance of $20) and temporal discounting (e.g., $5 now vs. $10 later). The effect of mortality depended critically on whether people grew up in a relatively resource-scarce or resource-plentiful environment. For individuals who grew up relatively poor, mortality cues led them to value the present and gamble for big…

Citation impact

782
total citations
FWCI
26.61
Percentile
100%
References
86
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Gratification
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Psychology
  • Time preference
  • Temporal discounting
  • Social psychology
  • Scarcity
  • Value (mathematics)
No related works found for this paper.

Funding