articleNew England Journal of MedicineMay 12, 2004BRONZE OA

A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer

TCThe Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group
PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive, laparoscopically assisted surgery was first considered in 1990 for patients undergoing colectomy for cancer. Concern that this approach would compromise survival by failing to achieve a proper oncologic resection or adequate staging or by altering patterns of recurrence (based on frequent reports of tumor recurrences within surgical wounds) prompted a controlled trial evaluation.

Methods

We conducted a noninferiority trial at 48 institutions and randomly assigned 872 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon to undergo open or laparoscopically assisted colectomy performed by credentialed surgeons. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. The primary end point was the time to tumor recurrence.

Citation impact

3,397
total citations
FWCI
71.65
Percentile
100%
References
22
Citations per year

Authors

1
  • TC
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study GroupCorresponding

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Hazard ratio
  • Colectomy
  • Surgery
  • Perioperative
  • Confidence interval
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Laparoscopy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.