An Inconvenient Truth: Arbitrary Distinctions Between Organizational, Mechanical Turk, and Other Convenience Samples
Old Dominion University · George Washington University
Abstract
Sampling strategy has critical implications for the validity of a researcher's conclusions. Despite this, sampling is frequently neglected in research methods textbooks, during the research design process, and in the reporting of our journals. The lack of guidance on this issue often leads reviewers and journal editors to rely on simple rules of thumb, myth, and tradition for judgments about sampling, which promotes the unnecessary and counterproductive characterization of sampling strategies as universally “good” or “bad.” Such oversimplification, especially by journal editors and reviewers, slows the progress of the social sciences by considering legitimate data sources to be categorically unacceptable.…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 85.40
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 50
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Sample (material)
- Rule of thumb
- Sampling (signal processing)
- Psychology
- Simple random sample
- Psychological research
- External validity
- Social psychology
- Decent work and economic growth