reviewSystematic ReviewsFeb 10, 2016GOLD OA

What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · RAND Corporation · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

The need for systematic methods for reviewing evidence is continuously increasing. Evidence mapping is one emerging method. There are no authoritative recommendations for what constitutes an evidence map or what methods should be used, and anecdotal evidence suggests heterogeneity in both. Our objectives are to identify published evidence maps and to compare and contrast the presented definitions of evidence mapping, the domains used to classify data in evidence maps, and the form the evidence map takes.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of publications that presented results with a process termed "evidence mapping" or included a figure called an "evidence map." We identified publications from searches of ten databases through 8/21/2015, reference mining, and consulting topic experts. We abstracted the research question, the unit of analysis, the search methods and search period covered, and the country of origin. Data were narratively synthesized.

Citation impact

611
total citations
FWCI
77.93
Percentile
100%
References
75
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Systematic review
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Concept map
  • Empirical evidence
  • Contrast (vision)
  • Medicine
  • Data science
  • Information retrieval
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Reduced inequalities
No related works found for this paper.