articlejurnal pendidikan humanioraApr 17, 2026GOLD OA

Fallacies In English Department Students’ Claims: A Rhetorical Analysis Of Critical Thinking

Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim

Indexed incrossrefdoaj

Abstract

This study focuses on the fallacies found in English department students’ claims of fact, value and policy. It employs qualitative design as the object is the real reflection of critical thinking in the form of writing to understand the fallacies varieties. The data are in the form of the sentences in the claims written by the students of UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang who took critical writing course. On claims of fact, the fallacies found include hasty generalization, irrelevancy, slippery slope, oversimplification and begging the question. Regarding pathos, the fallacy type covers ad populum, appeal to emotion premises and red herring. Meanwhile the ethos fallacy occurs in straw man only. On claims of…

Citation impact

7
total citations
FWCI
0.00
Percentile
97%
References
4
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Rhetorical question
  • Critical thinking
  • Pedagogy
  • Sociology
  • Psychology
  • Epistemology
  • Linguistics
  • Philosophy
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.