Fallacies In English Department Students’ Claims: A Rhetorical Analysis Of Critical Thinking
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Abstract
This study focuses on the fallacies found in English department students’ claims of fact, value and policy. It employs qualitative design as the object is the real reflection of critical thinking in the form of writing to understand the fallacies varieties. The data are in the form of the sentences in the claims written by the students of UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang who took critical writing course. On claims of fact, the fallacies found include hasty generalization, irrelevancy, slippery slope, oversimplification and begging the question. Regarding pathos, the fallacy type covers ad populum, appeal to emotion premises and red herring. Meanwhile the ethos fallacy occurs in straw man only. On claims of…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Percentile
- 97%
- References
- 4
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Rhetorical question
- Critical thinking
- Pedagogy
- Sociology
- Psychology
- Epistemology
- Linguistics
- Philosophy
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions