book chapterDec 31, 2019Closed access

3. Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Mimicry reveals something in so far as it is distinct from what might be called an itself that is behind. The discourse of post-Enlightenment English colonialism often speaks in a tongue that is forked, not false. If colonialism takes power in the name of history, it repeatedly exercises its authority through the figures of farce. The effect of mimicry on the authority of colonial discourse is profound and disturbing. A classic text of such partiality is Charles Grant’s ‘Observations on the state of society among the Asiatic subjects of Great Britain’ which was only superseded by James Mills’s History of India as the most influential early nineteenth-century account of Indian manners and morals. The absurd…

Citation impact

1,218
total citations
FWCI
475.32
Percentile
100%
References
5
Citations per year

Authors

1

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Mimicry
  • Colonialism
  • Enlightenment
  • Ambivalence
  • Power (physics)
  • Subject (documents)
  • State (computer science)
  • Fable
No related works found for this paper.