articleNew England Journal of MedicineMay 21, 2006BRONZE OA

Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury

TNThe National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network
PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Optimal fluid management in patients with acute lung injury is unknown. Diuresis or fluid restriction may improve lung function but could jeopardize extrapulmonary-organ perfusion.

Methods

In a randomized study, we compared a conservative and a liberal strategy of fluid management using explicit protocols applied for seven days in 1000 patients with acute lung injury. The primary end point was death at 60 days. Secondary end points included the number of ventilator-free days and organ-failure-free days and measures of lung physiology.

Citation impact

3,496
total citations
FWCI
109.42
Percentile
100%
References
35
Citations per year

Authors

1
  • TN
    The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials NetworkCorresponding

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Fraction of inspired oxygen
  • Lung
  • Confidence interval
  • Intensive care unit
  • Anesthesia
  • Shock (circulatory)
  • Mechanical ventilation
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.