articleJAMAMar 29, 2016BRONZE OA

Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Harvard University · +21 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces ischemia but increases bleeding.

Objective

To develop a clinical decision tool to identify patients expected to derive benefit vs harm from continuing thienopyridine beyond 1 year after PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Among 11,648 randomized DAPT Study patients from 11 countries (August 2009-May 2014), a prediction rule was derived stratifying patients into groups to distinguish ischemic and bleeding risk 12 to 30 months after PCI. Validation was internal via bootstrap resampling and external among 8136 patients from 36 countries randomized in the PROTECT trial (June 2007-July 2014). EXPOSURES: Twelve months of open-label thienopyridine plus aspirin, then randomized to 18 months of continued thienopyridine plus aspirin vs placebo plus aspirin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ischemia (myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis) and bleeding (moderate or severe) 12 to 30 months after PCI.

Citation impact

909
total citations
FWCI
92.34
Percentile
100%
References
36
Citations per year

Authors

17

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Conventional PCI
  • Thienopyridine
  • Aspirin
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Internal medicine
  • Cardiology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding