reviewEpidemiologyMar 28, 2014Closed access

Methodological Challenges in Mendelian Randomization

Harvard University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

We give critical attention to the assumptions underlying Mendelian randomization analysis and their biological plausibility. Several scenarios violating the Mendelian randomization assumptions are described, including settings with inadequate phenotype definition, the setting of time-varying exposures, the presence of gene-environment interaction, the existence of measurement error, the possibility of reverse causation, and the presence of linkage disequilibrium. Data analysis examples are given, illustrating that the inappropriate use of instrumental variable techniques when the Mendelian randomization assumptions are violated can lead to biases of enormous magnitude. To help address some of the strong…

Citation impact

579
total citations
FWCI
23.96
Percentile
100%
References
44
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Mendelian randomization
  • Causation
  • Instrumental variable
  • Outcome (game theory)
  • Econometrics
  • Mendelian inheritance
  • Variable (mathematics)
  • Causal inference
No related works found for this paper.