articleTransactions of the ASABEDec 30, 2015Closed access

Hydrologic and Water Quality Models: Performance Measures and Evaluation Criteria

DNDaniel N. MoriasiMWMargaret W. GitauNPNaresh PaiPDPrasad Daggupati
Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Performance measures (PMs) and corresponding performance evaluation criteria (PEC) are important aspects of calibrating and validating hydrologic and water quality models and should be updated with advances in modeling science. We synthesized PMs and PEC from a previous special collection, performed a meta-analysis of performance data reported in recent peer-reviewed literature for three widely published watershed-scale models (SWAT, HSPF, WARMF), and one field-scale model (ADAPT), and provided guidelines for model performance evaluation. Based on the synthesis, meta-analysis, and personal modeling experiences, we recommend coefficient of determination (R2; in conjunction with gradient and intercept of the…

Citation impact

2,538
total citations
FWCI
34.75
Percentile
100%
References
0
Citations per year

Authors

4
  • DN
    Daniel N. MoriasiCorresponding
  • MW
    Margaret W. Gitau
  • NP
    Naresh Pai
  • PD
    Prasad Daggupati

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Watershed
  • Environmental science
  • Mean squared error
  • Scale (ratio)
  • Coefficient of determination
  • Hydrology (agriculture)
  • Statistics
  • Mathematics
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Clean water and sanitation
No related works found for this paper.