articleNeurophotonicsMar 9, 2016HYBRID OA

False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: issues, challenges, and the way forward

University College London · University Hospital of Zurich · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdatacitedoajpubmed

Abstract

We highlight a significant problem that needs to be considered and addressed when performing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies, namely the possibility of inadvertently measuring fNIRS hemodynamic responses that are not due to neurovascular coupling. These can be misinterpreted as brain activity, i.e., "false positives" (errors caused by wrongly assigning a detected hemodynamic response to functional brain activity), or mask brain activity, i.e., "false negatives" (errors caused by wrongly assigning a not observed hemodynamic response in the presence of functional brain activity). Here, we summarize the possible physiological origins of these issues and suggest ways to avoid and remove them.

Citation impact

552
total citations
FWCI
41.93
Percentile
100%
References
60
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
  • False positive paradox
  • Haemodynamic response
  • Neurovascular bundle
  • False positives and false negatives
  • Hemodynamics
  • Brain activity and meditation
  • Neuroscience
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.

Funding