Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
University of Connecticut · UConn Health · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines.
A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 46.88
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 29
Authors
5- SHShirin Heidari
- TFThomas F. BaborCorresponding
University of Connecticut, UConn Health
- PDPaola De Castro
Istituto Superiore di Sanità
- STSera Tort
Cochrane
- MCMirjam Curno
International AIDS Society
Topics & keywords
- Generalizability theory
- Publishing
- Gender equity
- Equity (law)
- Public relations
- Political science
- Psychology
- Social science
- Gender equality