letterBMJMay 4, 2016BRONZE OA

BMI and all cause mortality: systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of 230 cohort studies with 3.74 million deaths among 30.3 million participants

Imperial College London · Norwegian University of Science and Technology · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of body mass index (BMI) and the risk of all cause mortality, and to clarify the shape and the nadir of the dose-response curve, and the influence on the results of confounding from smoking, weight loss associated with disease, and preclinical disease. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase databases searched up to 23 September 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Cohort studies that reported adjusted risk estimates for at least three categories of BMI in relation to all cause mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Summary relative risks were calculated with random effects models. Non-linear associations were explored with fractional polynomial models.

Results

230 cohort studies (207 publications) were included. The analysis of never smokers included 53 cohort studies (44 risk estimates) with >738 144 deaths and >9 976 077 participants. The analysis of all participants included 228 cohort studies (198 risk estimates) with >3 744 722 deaths among 30 233 329 participants. The summary relative risk for a 5 unit increment in BMI was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.21; I(2)=95%, n=44) among never smokers, 1.21 (1.18 to 1.25; I(2)=93%, n=25) among healthy never smokers, 1.27 (1.21 to 1.33; I(2)=89%, n=11) among healthy never smokers with exclusion of early follow-up, and 1.05 (1.04 to 1.07; I(2)=97%, n=198) among all participants. There was a J shaped dose-response relation in never smokers (Pnon-linearity

Citation impact

954
total citations
FWCI
40.40
Percentile
100%
References
279
Citations per year

Authors

8

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Meta-analysis
  • Cohort
  • Body mass index
  • Confidence interval
  • Confounding
  • Cohort study
  • Relative risk
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding