Understanding scoping reviews
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Methods
This manuscript represents a brief report. Processes to develop the brief include detailed search and review of scoping review literature in CINAHL and PubMed. Both methodologic reports and reviews were included. Definitions and uses of scoping reviews were reviewed.
Conclusion
The definition and process of scoping review are evolving. Although there is controversy regarding the methodology, there is increasing visibility of scoping review methodology in the published literature since the year 2000, with over 500 published reviews currently available. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A well-executed scoping review has potential to inform NP practice, policy, education, and research.
Citation impact
728
total citations
- FWCI
- 134.90
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 22
Citations per year
Authors
4Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- CINAHL
- Systematic review
- Management science
- Scholarship
- MEDLINE
- Engineering ethics
- Computer science
- Medicine
No related works found for this paper.