Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data
Abstract
There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
A methodological working group of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, was formed to create guidance for conducting systematic reviews of studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence information. All methodological output of the group was subject to peer review and feedback by members of the international evidence synthesis community.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 18
Authors
5Topics & keywords
- Observational study
- Systematic review
- Epidemiology
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology
- Incidence (geometry)
- Medicine
- Disease
- Critical appraisal
- Good health and well-being