articleNew England Journal of MedicineJun 12, 2016BRONZE OA

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · +10 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

The prognosis for adults with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia is poor. We sought to determine whether inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, results in better outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia than does standard therapy.

Methods

In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia to receive either inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab ozogamicin group) or standard intensive chemotherapy (standard-therapy group). The primary end points were complete remission (including complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and overall survival.

Citation impact

1,364
total citations
FWCI
134.79
Percentile
100%
References
40
Citations per year

Authors

14

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Calicheamicin
  • Medicine
  • Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • Refractory (planetary science)
  • CD22
  • Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
  • Oncology
  • Acute lymphocytic leukemia
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • No poverty
No related works found for this paper.