Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · +10 more institutions
Abstract
The prognosis for adults with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia is poor. We sought to determine whether inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, results in better outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia than does standard therapy.
In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia to receive either inotuzumab ozogamicin (inotuzumab ozogamicin group) or standard intensive chemotherapy (standard-therapy group). The primary end points were complete remission (including complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and overall survival.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 134.79
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 40
Authors
14- HMHagop M. KantarjianCorresponding
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- DJDaniel J. DeAngelo
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- MSMatthias Stelljes
University Hospital Münster, Klinik für Schlafmedizin
- GMGiovanni Martinelli
University of Bologna
- MLMichaela Liedtke
Cancer Institute (WIA), Stanford Cancer Institute
Topics & keywords
- Calicheamicin
- Medicine
- Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Refractory (planetary science)
- CD22
- Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
- Oncology
- Acute lymphocytic leukemia
- No poverty